Status basis: github_stars gained 290 in the last 3d after a flat 3d baseline (no prior movement to compare a ratio against)
- Accelerating github_stars gained 290 in the last 3d after a flat 3d baseline (no prior movement to compare a ratio against)
- Reactivated github_stars did not move for 7d, then gained 290 in the last 3d
- Accelerating github_stars gained 290 in the last 3d after a flat 3d baseline (no prior movement to compare a ratio against)
- Reactivated github_stars did not move for 7d, then gained 290 in the last 3d
- Accelerating github_stars gained 272 in the last 3d after a flat 3d baseline (no prior movement to compare a ratio against)
- Reactivated github_stars did not move for 7d, then gained 272 in the last 3d
- Anomaly daily change 12.0 is -3.7 standard deviations from this entity's own prior mean (24.9±3.5, baseline excludes this point) — unusual, not necessarily adoption
- Anomaly daily change 24.0 is -5.3 standard deviations from this entity's own prior mean (30.4±1.2, baseline excludes this point) — unusual, not necessarily adoption
- Accelerating github_stars gained 268 in the last 3d after a flat 3d baseline (no prior movement to compare a ratio against)
- Reactivated github_stars did not move for 7d, then gained 268 in the last 3d
- Anomaly daily change 24.0 is -5.3 standard deviations from this entity's own prior mean (30.4±1.2, baseline excludes this point) — unusual, not necessarily adoption
- Anomaly daily change 24.0 is -5.3 standard deviations from this entity's own prior mean (30.4±1.2, baseline excludes this point) — unusual, not necessarily adoption
- Anomaly daily change 24.0 is -5.3 standard deviations from this entity's own prior mean (30.4±1.2, baseline excludes this point) — unusual, not necessarily adoption
- Anomaly daily change 24.0 is -5.3 standard deviations from this entity's own prior mean (30.4±1.2, baseline excludes this point) — unusual, not necessarily adoption
- Anomaly daily change 24.0 is -5.3 standard deviations from this entity's own prior mean (30.4±1.2, baseline excludes this point) — unusual, not necessarily adoption
- first observed Kanon started keeping permanent history for this agent
| Machine-callable | — | unknown | — |
| Open source | 1 | verified | 1 quote(s) |
| Self-hostable | — | unknown | — |
| Bring your own key | — | unknown | — |
| Autonomy level | 2 | inferred | 1 quote(s) |
| Pricing model | — | unknown | — |
| Integrations | — | unknown | — |
“Unknown” means we have not verified it — it is not a “no”. Hard filters never treat unknown as false.
Backed by Lark, it provides full access to enterprise capabilities, making it a foundational tool for AI-driven workflow automation.
Evidence quotesverbatim, from the product’s own materials
“public GitHub repository (README fetched)”— structural
“200+ commands and 26 AI Agent Skills”— description
“26 AI Agent Skills”— readme
FAQ
What is cli?
The official CLI tool for Lark/Feishu, built for developers and AI agents to automate core business workflows
What does cli do?
Enable developers and AI agents to efficiently interact with Lark/Feishu’s core features for enterprise automation.
Why does cli matter?
Backed by Lark, it provides full access to enterprise capabilities, making it a foundational tool for AI-driven workflow automation.
How much does cli cost?
Free
Is cli free?
Yes — cli has a free tier. Pricing as stated on its own page: Free
Is cli open source?
Yes — cli is open source.
How popular is cli?
As tracked by KanonAgent: 23 upvotes (first indexed 2026-07-08).
What are the best cli alternatives?
Similar AI agents tracked by KanonAgent: open-design, deer-flow, Agent-Reach, ruflo, career-ops, orca.